Ottawa is pledging to use “fiscal guardrails” to determine when it will wind down its stimulus program and end the extraordinary flood of spending that will send the net federal debt soaring far past the $1-trillion mark.
As part of Monday’s fall economic update, Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland pointed to that approach as a way to be transparent with Canadians, saying the government will use “data-driven triggers” focused on the jobs market: the employment rate, the unemployment rate and, “crucially,” total hours worked.
But those fiscal guardrails are shrouded in fog, leaving Canadians with little insight as to when the federal government might deem the economy sufficiently recovered that it will turn its attention to reducing spending to sustainable levels. What level of employment, what unemployment rate, what number of hours worked will trigger a retrenchment of spending?
Ms. Freeland isn’t saying. “We’re going to roll those out when we roll out more details of our growth plan,” she said when pressed by reporters for specifics.
Liberals plan $100-billion in new stimulus spending, begin plotting pandemic recovery
Ottawa vows tailored financial support for hardest-hit sectors
The timing of the reintroduction of fiscal anchors, a public promise to place limits on spending, is similarly up in the air. Right now, the only commitment from Ms. Freeland is to reintroduce a fiscal anchor “when the economy is more stable.”
Until July, fiscal anchors had been the keystone of federal budgets for three decades. Ms. Freeland’s predecessor, Bill Morneau, scrapped the government’s anchor of a declining ratio of debt to gross domestic product in his limited fiscal update that month. The surge in pandemic spending made that move a foregone conclusion. He had hinted that the government would reintroduce a new measure this fall, but Ms. Freeland is now promising only that the Liberals will recommit themselves to fiscal limits at some indeterminate point in the future.
The five-year projections in the economic update appear to give some assurances on that front, with the deficit projected to fall to $121.5-billion in fiscal 2021-22, declining to just $24.9-billion in 2025-26. That would leave the deficit lower than its prepandemic levels. The debt-to-GDP ratio would peak at 52.6 per cent in 2021-22, falling gradually to 49.6 per cent over the next four years.
federal budget deficits
Including second wave impact, fiscal year, $ billions
Including worsening pandemic
and $70-billion in stimulus spending
Budget deficits–
2020 update
$0
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
2019-
2020
2020-
2021
2021-
2022
2022-
2023
2023-
2024
2024-
2025
2025-
2026
historical federal debt as percentage of gdp
End of fiscal year, 1982-2026
7
0%
Includes
stimulus
spending
as shown
in first
chart
6
0
5
0
4
0
3
0
20
1
9
8
2
1
9
8
7
1
9
9
2
1
9
9
7
2
0
0
2
2
0
0
7
2
0
1
2
2
0
1
7
2
0
2
2
JOHN SOPINSKI/THE GLOBE AND MAIL, SOURCE: Department
of Finance Canada; statscan
federal budget deficits
Including second wave impact, fiscal year, $ billions
Including worsening pandemic
and $70-billion in stimulus spending
Budget deficits–
2020 update
$0
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
2019-
2020
2020-
2021
2021-
2022
2022-
2023
2023-
2024
2024-
2025
2025-
2026
historical federal debt as percentage of gdp
End of fiscal year, 1982-2026
7
0%
Includes
stimulus
spending
as shown
in first
chart
6
0
5
0
4
0
3
0
20
1
9
8
2
1
9
8
7
1
9
9
2
1
9
9
7
2
0
0
2
2
0
0
7
2
0
1
2
2
0
1
7
2
0
2
2
JOHN SOPINSKI/THE GLOBE AND MAIL, SOURCE: Department
of Finance Canada; statscan
federal budget deficits
Including second wave impact, fiscal year, $ billions
Including worsening pandemic
and $70-billion in stimulus spending
Budget deficits–
2020 update
$0
-50
-100
-150
-200
-250
-300
-350
-400
2019-
2020
2020-
2021
2021-
2022
2022-
2023
2023-
2024
2024-
2025
2025-
2026
historical federal debt as percentage of gdp
End of fiscal year, 1982-2026
7
0%
Includes
stimulus
spending
as shown
in first
chart
6
0
5
0
4
0
3
0
20
1
9
8
2
1
9
8
7
1
9
9
2
1
9
9
7
2
0
0
2
2
0
0
7
2
0
1
2
2
0
1
7
2
0
2
2
JOHN SOPINSKI/THE GLOBE AND MAIL, SOURCE: Department of Finance
Canada statscan
But that picture of modest fiscal discipline doesn’t include the government’s three-year plan to spend between $70-billion and $100-billion on economic stimulus. Nor does it take into account the costs of some of the broad promises of the fall’s Throne Speech, including a pharmacare program and what could be a costly venture into an expanded federal role in child care. It also excludes billions in potential added costs from revisions to the formula for calculating fiscal stabilization payments to the provinces announced as part of Monday’s economic update.
The government provided some scenarios that wrapped in the costs of its stimulus program, along with more pessimistic assumptions on the virulence of the coronavirus this winter, and the resulting economic and fiscal damage. That is part of what Ms. Freeland says is the government’s effort to be “transparent about the continuing uncertainty.”
The projection of a $50.7-billion deficit in 2022-23 nearly doubles, to $99.6-billion, in the scenario of only a slight worsening of the coronavirus and a $70-billion price tag for the three-year stimulus spending. In that forecast, the debt-to-GDP ratio peaks at 57.3 per cent before declining to 55.5 per cent in 2025-26.
And, deficits are much larger in the worst case, with a resurgent virus and a $100-billion stimulus program. Again, those projections do not include costs such as increased fiscal stabilization payments or new federal child care spending.
“It’s a very confusing picture,” says Alexandre Laurin, director of research at the C.D. Howe Institute. He noted that Monday’s update provided more clarity than the July more-limited update, which provided projections only for the current fiscal year.
But the fiscal outlook is still cloudy, Mr. Laurin said, pointing to major looming expenditures that don’t appear in the update. Mr. Laurin said the spending priorities laid out in the Throne Speech would be costly, between $19-billion and $44-billion a year, depending on the breadth of the Liberals’ ambitions.
That would put federal finances on a much different track than the gradually declining debt depicted in the outlook. Instead, big increases in program spending would cement in place large deficits, leaving debt rising relative to the Canadian economy – and federal finances increasingly precarious.
revenue and expenses breakdown
April-Sept. 2020
$327-billion
$7.7: Net actuarial
losses
$12.3: SAR (Safe
Restart Agreement)
$6.3: CEBA 25%
incentive
$44.1: CEWS
$66.5: CERB
$10.4: Public debt
charges
$45.7: Major transfers
to other levels of gov’t,
excl. Safe Restart
Agreement
$128.8-billion
$1.6: Other
revenues
$19.0: Excise
taxes and
duties
$81.8: Direct program
expenses, excl. CEWS
and 25% incentive
$18.6: Corp.
income taxes
$10.9: EI
premiums
$55.2: Major transfers
to persons, excl.
CERB
$78.8: Pers.
income tax
REVENUE
EXPENSES
CEWS: Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy; CERB: Canada Emerency
Response Benefit; CEBA: Canada Emergency Business Account
JOHN SOPINSKI/THE GLOBE AND MAIL, SOURCE: department
of finance canada
revenue and expenses breakdown
April-Sept. 2020
$327-billion
$7.7: Net actuarial
losses
$12.3: SAR (Safe
Restart Agreement)
$6.3: CEBA 25%
incentive
$44.1: CEWS
$66.5: CERB
$10.4: Public debt
charges
$45.7: Major transfers
to other levels of gov’t,
excl. Safe Restart
Agreement
$128.8-billion
$1.6: Other
revenues
$19.0: Excise
taxes and
duties
$81.8: Direct program
expenses, excl. CEWS
and 25% incentive
$18.6: Corp.
income taxes
$10.9: EI
premiums
$55.2: Major transfers
to persons, excl.
CERB
$78.8: Personal
income tax
REVENUE
EXPENSES
CEWS: Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy; CERB: Canada Emerency
Response Benefit; CEBA: Canada Emergency Business Account
JOHN SOPINSKI/THE GLOBE AND MAIL, SOURCE: department
of finance canada
revenue and expenses breakdown
April-Sept. 2020
$327-billion
$7.7: Net actuarial
losses
$12.3: SAR (Safe
Restart Agreement)
$6.3: CEBA 25%
incentive
$44.1: CEWS
$66.5: CERB
$10.4: Public debt
charges
$45.7: Major transfers
to other levels of gov’t,
excl. Safe Restart
Agreement
$128.8-billion
$1.6: Other
revenues
$19.0: Excise
taxes and
duties
$81.8: Direct program
expenses, excl. CEWS
and 25% incentive
$18.6: Corp.
income taxes
$10.9: EI
premiums
$55.2: Major transfers
to persons, excl.
CERB
$78.8: Personal
income tax
REVENUE
EXPENSES
CEWS: Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy; CERB: Canada Emerency Response Benefit;
CEBA: Canada Emergency Business Account
JOHN SOPINSKI/THE GLOBE AND MAIL, SOURCE: department
of finance canada
Your time is valuable. Have the Top Business Headlines newsletter conveniently delivered to your inbox in the morning or evening. Sign up today.